<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mileagebooster.co.uk - HHO scam in the UK.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.eco-scams.com/archives/696/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.eco-scams.com/archives/696</link>
	<description>Jon Starbuck's blog debunking and exposing all things pseudo-green.</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 08:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.eco-scams.com/archives/696#comment-8082</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 13:42:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonstarbuck.co.uk/archives/696#comment-8082</guid>
		<description>Dear Kent,
Actually... if you read my blog you would see that I know of all of the dozens of ways by which HHO is said to "work", and I shoot them all down. Yours is a very elaborate and scientific sounding one; who is the scientist or engineer who told you this? And where did they get this information about "makes the regular fuel burn faster and more completely" and "early part of the combustion cycle". It is bullshit, isn't it? You made it up. 
There is no way by which your magic fuel saving machine can work, bottom line is where is this extra energy coming from? You can't make energy from nothing. 
However, like any scientist, I am very open to being proven wrong, all you have to do is show me the evidence. Should be very easy for a man who knows as much as you. Please supply the world with the data you have to back up your claims so that we can assess if your conclusions are reasonable....
While we are waiting for what I know will be an eternity I feel this may be an interesting way to spend 40 minutes - http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00sllf3/University_Challenged/ 
Jon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Kent,<br />
Actually&#8230; if you read my blog you would see that I know of all of the dozens of ways by which HHO is said to &#8220;work&#8221;, and I shoot them all down. Yours is a very elaborate and scientific sounding one; who is the scientist or engineer who told you this? And where did they get this information about &#8220;makes the regular fuel burn faster and more completely&#8221; and &#8220;early part of the combustion cycle&#8221;. It is bullshit, isn&#8217;t it? You made it up.<br />
There is no way by which your magic fuel saving machine can work, bottom line is where is this extra energy coming from? You can&#8217;t make energy from nothing.<br />
However, like any scientist, I am very open to being proven wrong, all you have to do is show me the evidence. Should be very easy for a man who knows as much as you. Please supply the world with the data you have to back up your claims so that we can assess if your conclusions are reasonable&#8230;.<br />
While we are waiting for what I know will be an eternity I feel this may be an interesting way to spend 40 minutes - <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00sllf3/University_Challenged/" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00sllf3/University_Challenged/</a><br />
Jon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Bengtsson</title>
		<link>http://www.eco-scams.com/archives/696#comment-8081</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Bengtsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 12:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonstarbuck.co.uk/archives/696#comment-8081</guid>
		<description>I was getting a bit cross that I had been left out of the scammers here in the UK.
Not that I care what someone with a fixed idea thinks. 
You obviously have not done an unbiased test of this technology yourself, but are probably reasoning like this:
"It takes more energy to make the HHO out of water than one can possibly get back when burning it - therefore it is a scam"
What if that is not how it works?
What if the explosive qualities of HHO makes the regular fuel burn faster and more completely, thereby giving more push in the early part of the combustion cycle and leaving less uncombusted fuel going out with the exhausts.
I am not making any money worth the bother from the manual I provide and am not actively promoting it, so you do not need to feel the need to go on a mission to attack me.
If it makes you happy, keep doing what you are doing. Those that have powers of observation can make up their own minds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was getting a bit cross that I had been left out of the scammers here in the UK.<br />
Not that I care what someone with a fixed idea thinks.<br />
You obviously have not done an unbiased test of this technology yourself, but are probably reasoning like this:<br />
&#8220;It takes more energy to make the HHO out of water than one can possibly get back when burning it - therefore it is a scam&#8221;<br />
What if that is not how it works?<br />
What if the explosive qualities of HHO makes the regular fuel burn faster and more completely, thereby giving more push in the early part of the combustion cycle and leaving less uncombusted fuel going out with the exhausts.<br />
I am not making any money worth the bother from the manual I provide and am not actively promoting it, so you do not need to feel the need to go on a mission to attack me.<br />
If it makes you happy, keep doing what you are doing. Those that have powers of observation can make up their own minds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dom Kaos</title>
		<link>http://www.eco-scams.com/archives/696#comment-7660</link>
		<dc:creator>dom Kaos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 22:38:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jonstarbuck.co.uk/archives/696#comment-7660</guid>
		<description>Hi Jon. I haven't been to Crawley Down for a few years, but I know the area fairly well and you're right to surmise that it's a private address - a quiet cul-de-sac in the arse-end of Gatwick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jon. I haven&#8217;t been to Crawley Down for a few years, but I know the area fairly well and you&#8217;re right to surmise that it&#8217;s a private address - a quiet cul-de-sac in the arse-end of Gatwick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
